The way to win over a reader is to make
an emotional connection. Logic and credibility are often necessary but they aren't what persuade. Backing evidence is only needed when the reader plans on doing
something about the subject. If I am going to adopt an idea as my own, I am
going to want logic and credibility to back me: but not because that makes me
right. Yes, it helps to convince, but
most importantly, logic allows the reader to have confidence in their stance. When asked why we feel a certain way, others
expect reasons, and it is logic that
we give them to make us feel
justified. We truly accept certain ideas because of emotional ties, but supporting
evidence allows us to follow our gut feeling. I saw this today in class when we watched the
Old Spice commercial. I, like so many others, fell in love with Old Spice
products following the release of their commercials. This is because of the emotional bond that
they made with their viewers. They stated no logic whatsoever, and no one cared
in the slightest. I will never be seriously asked, ‘Why do you like Old Spice?’
and therefore, need no knowledge or reasons to back myself up! With a hot-topic issue though, my opinion
will be challenged, and therefore I seek for the logical points that support my
point of view: not because they make me right, but because they make me feel
justified. My advice is to focus on the emotional connection you are making and
provide enough evidence to make the reader feel secure when they adopt your
view.
Haha totally true. There is no real reason for liking the Old Spice commercials. You just DO. Nicely put.
ReplyDeleteI like how you use the word "justified" in describing the role of facts and logic. The reader doesn't want to argue their own ideas; they want to feel justified in the choices they've already made. Great insight!
ReplyDelete