Another very important element that allows me to empathize with an argument is the authors credibility. The credibility or the credentials that an author holds is a necessity when fully trying to persuade an audience. If I am reading an argument about a specific issue, I want to know the factual background that the author has in the field of study in terms of the issue. If an author is arguing against a new form of medicine that can potentially cure a disease, I want the author to have a doctorate or other high level of education in medicine or medical drugs. If the author does not have the right credentials for the issue at hand, the argument seems useless. I feel like the author is arguing purely from their own emotions when one does not have sufficient credibility.
The logic that the author uses is also an essential tool to an arguments persuasiveness. If the supporting facts or evidence of an issue is irrelevant or illogical, then the whole argument is unreliable, useless, and not worth my time to read.
Lastly, there has to be an emotional tie in that the author adds to fully persuade the audience. The addition of emotion into an argument should not be superfluous in any way, however, it should reach out to the audience in a way that creates an emotional connection in ourselves.
I like how you clarified the role of emotion in the author's writing. I agree that it is important to play to the readers emotions, and I like that you emphasized that over-doing it can be a detriment to one's writing. Like you said, the author needs to incite an emotional connection within the reader. If he tries to over-do it, it can be just as bad as not including it at all.
ReplyDelete